Will Cognitive Computing Kill the "Teachable Moment"?
Back in 2014, I attended the Parenteral Drug Association (PDA) conference and we talked a lot about the teachable moment. If this term is new for some of you, the “teachable moment” refers to a time when an individual is most receptive to learning something. It includes the idea that the thing learned at that moment, when the individual needs to know or use it, is likely to be deeply impressed on the person. It also includes the concepts that these moments are somewhat unpredictable and can be fleeting; it isn’t always possible to create teachable moments; and they may arise in very mundane situations, or in circumstances that are unusual and unlikely to occur again.
Personally, I’ve always loved the phrase “teachable moment.” It has been foundational in helping people understand how the flow of knowledge supports a teachable moment. Can you describe a teachable moment in your organization? An example in the pharmaceutical industry can be found in the product lifecycle management process. As a product goes through the lifecycle of development, it may spend years in research, design, and commercialization. Learnings happen during trials that are run and when key opinion leaders and experts engage in dialog to support development. Many times there are gaps in what learnings, aka knowledge, are transferred to produce the product. This may have a potential impact on the cycle time for production and/or the overall quality of the product. Ultimately, the many touches and cycle time of this process produces countless teachable moments, not to mention that it has given KM a reason to exist for 2 decades.
Now we are in the 21st century and Bob Dylan is talking to IBM’s Watson; Amazon’s “Alexa” is interacting with families; and I’m part of an APQC Advanced Working Group trying to understand how KM can better leverage the capabilities brought to us by cognitive computing. Won’t the ability to have information and knowledge brought to our fingertips make the teachable moment obsolete?
My colleague, Alex Philo, says that it will make the teachable moment become less impactful and less enduring. You don't have to learn or retain; you just have to know how to search for what you need when you need it. Another colleague, Chris Smith, says that while cognitive computing has obvious benefits, it’s missing the most important part – the human factor. “Connection is one of the most primitive needs; and teachable moments provide the connection and validation we all seek. (Note: these colleagues are millennials and are always open to learning!)
Will KM leaders even need to manage processes and engage people as part of the KM work? Is this going to help or hinder mature KM programs? Will it make it easier to start up a KM program, not paying attention to all of the capabilities that have been important for years? Remember, video killed the radio star. I’d love to hear from you…I feel a teachable moment coming on.
You can connect with me on Twitter @CHubert_apqcTweet