Analytics Case-in-point: Moving Beyond Benchmarks for Improved Performance



  • Type:
  • Published:
  • March 21, 2016
  • Author:
  • APQC
  • Pages:
  • 5
  • Price:
  • Your Price: $50.00
  • Member: FREE

Most process benchmarking or process analysis projects focus on descriptive statistics such as median costs or average ratings for satisfaction and cycle time. Though useful as an indicator of current performance, descriptive benchmarking does not provide information on “why” performance is what it is and how to improve it. Statistical analysis and predictive models, on the other hand, help organizations understand the relationships and drivers for key business process outcome and outline why and how the organization needs to improve its processes.

In 2015, APQC conducted a benchmarking effort that focused on automotive warranty performance measures. This case study explores that how the project developed a model to predict which factors improve key performance measures related to the business objectives: cycle time, customer retention, and costs.


Comments (0)

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <u> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.